Citizens United v. The Federal Election Commission grew from a limited question about a political documentary to a broad challenge to the government's right to restrict corporations from spending ...

Citizens United v. The Federal Election Commission grew from a limited question about a political documentary to a broad challenge to the government's right to restrict corporations from spending ...

The Trump administration and Republicans have argued that the limits on coordinated spending violate the First Amendment.

We're talking about the case Citizens United v. FEC. The court ruled 5-4 that corporations have the right to spend as much money as they like to support or oppose political candidates.

Description. In 2010, the Supreme Court issued a 5-4 decision in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission case, ruling in favor of Citizens United.

The Citizens United opinion is here. The judgment of the D.C. Circuit is reversed, in an opinion of the Court written by Justice Kennedy. Justice Stevens filed a partial dissent, which was read from ...

Next term, the Supreme Court will hear arguments challenging campaign finance restrictions on money donated from a political ...

And yet this week, a 5-4 Supreme Court struck down the limits that Congress passed in 2002 in this tradition in the case Citizens United v. FEC.

The Supreme Court's landmark Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling has fundamentally altered the landscape of ...

In the Supreme Court's landmark decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Justice Anthony Kennedy and a majority of the Court upheld some of this nation's most important founding ...

Bell Ringer: The Impact of Citizens United v. FEC. Clip 1 Clip 2. The Impact of Citizens United. Christian Berg, former Deputy General Counsel for Citizens United, and Meredith McGehee, ...