News

The Trump administration and Republicans have argued that the limits on coordinated spending violate the First Amendment.
The case, which centers on free speech claims, involves VP Vance, who was a Senate candidate in Ohio when the lawsuit was ...
The Supreme Court's landmark Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling has fundamentally altered the landscape of ...
The court will consider a Republican request to strike down restrictions on how much national party committees can spend in ...
On Monday, the court agreed to hear a challenge to campaign finance restrictions w limit the ability of party committees to directly coordinate spending with individual candidates. The anti-corruption ...
From 2008 to 2012, the two elections on either side of Citizens United, there was a 594% increase in independent expenditures ...
In 2010, Theodore Olson became a lead attorney in Citizens United v.Federal Election Commission, a landmark case that concerned election spending and freedom of speech and challenged federal ...
But it's worth noting that if not for the unpopular Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (FEC), it may have had no chance of hitting theaters before the election.
CLEVELAND HEIGHTS, Ohio -- January 21 was the 15th anniversary of the Citizens United v. FEC Supreme Court decision. The ruling has resulted in a dramatic increase in the amount of money spent by ...
But if not for the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. FEC, they could have simply had the government ban the movie for them. Citizens United has become a popular object of scorn, ...
The legal battle takes place against the backdrop of the Supreme Court’s landmark 2010 Citizens United v. FEC decision, which ...